The second argument presented by atheists in support of their belief is that the laws of nature and the law of cause and effect operating in the universe are so perfect and elaborate that there is absolutely no need for a Creator or a Higher Being. The unnecessary belief in God is mere superstition. This argument has also been refuted above and it was explained why, despite a perfect law, a Higher Being is still required. It was also clarified that, the law of cause and effect notwithstanding, presence of design in this universe and purpose of life argues for a Creator and a Controller. The reader may refer to the appropriate section, if necessary. It has not been realised that the law of cause and effect itself requires a Maker and a Supervisor. The causes and effects are like tools a craftsman uses to prepare things, and the end products prove the existence of the craftsman. Thus, the law of cause and effect cannot be used as an argument against the existence of God. On the contrary, the law and its effect in giving particular direction and design to the universe constitute an undeniable proof for existence of a Higher Being, which no intelligent person can deny.